• Home
  • Community
  • Charles County 2024 Proposed Charter: The Debate for Local Governance Reshaped

Charles County 2024 Proposed Charter: The Debate for Local Governance Reshaped

In the lead-up to the 2024 General Election, Charles County, Maryland, stands on the verge of a historic shift in its governance structure. The proposed Charter for Charles County, designed by a select Charter Board, aims to replace the current Code Home Rule system with a Charter form of government. If passed by voters, this transition could fundamentally alter how local government operates, placing more control in the hands of local officials and residents. The stakes are high, with key figures across various sectors of the community involved in this pivotal discussion.

The Proposal: A New Charter for Charles County

The Charter, as drafted by the Charter Board, serves as a local constitution, detailing the powers, duties, and structure of the county’s government. Charles County currently operates under a Code Home Rule system, where its authority is derived from the state of Maryland. Under a Charter government, the county would gain greater autonomy, giving local officials more direct control over decisions like taxation, budgeting, and the establishment of local laws without needing approval from the state legislature.

According to the Charter Board’s summary document, the proposed changes encompass everything from the organization of government offices to procedures for passing legislation. The document emphasizes key points such as term limits for local officials, clearer lines of accountability, and more streamlined governance. This proposal will be placed on the ballot in November 2024, where residents of Charles County will determine the future of their local government.

The Key Players: Shaping the Future of Charles County

Several prominent figures have emerged as pivotal voices in this debate, each bringing a unique perspective and influence to the discussion.

  • Greg Waring, The former charter board chair, who has approached the Charter debate with a cautious optimism. Patterson believes that the proposed Charter offers an opportunity for increased transparency and accountability within the government, two areas that he feels have been lacking under the current system.
  • County Commissioner Gilbert “BJ” Bowling is another central figure in this process. As a County Commissioner, Bowling has been at the forefront of discussions about how a Charter government could reshape the political and administrative landscape. While Bowling has voiced “NO” for the proposed Charter, he has remain vocal about the downside of transitioning to charter. We reached out to Mr. Bowling for an interview, still waiting for his response. 
  • Ralph E. Patterson, The Vice President of the Charles County Board of Commissioners, who has approached the Charter debate with a cautious optimism. Patterson believes that the proposed Charter offers an opportunity for increased transparency and accountability within the government, two areas that he feels have been lacking under the current system.
  • Delegate Dr. Edith J. Patterson, Maryland State Delegate, a longtime advocate for education and health policy in the Maryland General Assembly, has taken a keen interest in how the proposed Charter could impact social services. Dr. Patterson, who has a deep history of involvement in Charles County politics, has expressed support for the idea of a Charter government but has also called for citizens to take a detailed approach to reading the charter document. “We cannot afford to fall victim to terror or misinformation and encourage citizen to vote YES FOR CHARTER”.
  • Dyotha R. Sweat, President of the Charles County NAACP, has brought a civil rights perspective to the debate. Sweat is particularly concerned with how the Charter will address issues of equity and representation. She has called for specific provisions in the Charter that ensure communities of color and lower-income residents are not disenfranchised in the new system. “This is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to rewrite the rules of our local government,” Sweat said at a recent community forum, “and we must make sure these rules promote fairness and equal access for all residents.”
  • Delegate Debra M. Davis, Maryland State Delegate, a representative of Maryland’s 28th District, has advocated for more local control over county affairs. Davis believes that the proposed Charter could empower Charles County to better manage its resources and respond to local challenges without the red tape associated with state regulations. However, she has also urged for self governing, checks and balances that ensures transparency as communities continues to grow.
  • Eileen L. Britt and Ayana Moore, both members of HOA Boards, have both expressed there past involvements dealing with local government and builders. Britt, a seasoned policy analyst, has emphasized the importance of efficiency and accountability in government operations, while Moore has focused on ensuring that the Charter promotes transparency and citizen engagement. Both have advocated for mechanisms within the Charter that allow for regular reviews and updates to keep pace with changing societal needs.
  • Courtney Edmond, Attorney and former chair of the Planning Commission. Edmonds believes that the proposed Charter offers no opportunity for increased transparency and accountability within the government, two areas that he also feels have been lacking under the current system.

Community Impact and Controversy

The transition to a Charter form of government is not without controversy. Some residents and community leaders fear that the increased autonomy might lead to higher taxes or could place too much power in the hands of a few elected officials. Others worry about the potential for political cronyism or corruption if there are not enough checks and balances built into the system. These concerns have been raised at multiple public hearings, where residents have expressed both optimism and skepticism about the proposed changes.

In response to these concerns, the Charter Board has included provisions in the draft that seek to mitigate these risks. Term limits for local officials, mandatory public hearings for significant legislation, and clear guidelines for budgetary oversight are all intended to ensure that the new system remains accountable to the people it serves.

The Path Forward

As the 2024 General Election approaches, the debate over Charles County’s proposed Charter has continue to intensify. The Charter Board, along with local officials and community leaders, are work to educate residents on the details of the proposed Charter and its implications for the future of the county. Public forums, town halls, and educational campaigns are expected to play a crucial role in shaping public opinion in the weeks leading up to the vote.

Ultimately, the decision will rest with the voters. If passed, the proposed Charter will mark a significant shift in the governance of Charles County, offering both opportunities and challenges. For now, all eyes are on the Charter Board and the key players who are steering the county toward this pivotal moment in its history. Read more here

For more exclusives and video interviews please visit our Facebook page @waldorflive and Youtube.